Skip to main content

Survey Results



Course Survey Results


Carleton   Moore   ICS414, Spring 2024

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Course: ICS 414 - Software Engineering II
Department:   Information& Computer Sciences Crn (Section):   83673 (001)    


1.   Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Very Good (5) 
4.35 26 0.75   0(0%) 0(0%) 4(15%) 9(35%) 13(50%)
2.   Considering everything, how would you rate the GA/TA’s sections of this COURSE?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
3.87 23 0.87   0(0%) 1(4%) 7(30%) 9(39%) 6(26%)
3.   Considering everything, how would you rate the LAB for this course?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
3.92 24 0.88   0(0%) 1(4%) 7(29%) 9(38%) 7(29%)

4.   What did you find most valuable and helpful about the instructor?
Very flexible.
He is knowledgeable about the material and is willing to help.
The instructor is always ready and able to answer questions without any belittling.
Excellent
Open for consultation
Willing to help
The instructor is always there to help and assist in solving issues. He takes the time to walk through the problem with the student.
Email and discord reply
Great feedback on milestones and showed how to improve.
He is very knowledgeable and real. He sets you up well in his instruction courses
You can go to Moore with any technical problem and he is always willing to help the best he can.
He was always in class to watch over his students.
The instructor is always available and willing to help!
The minimal assignments we had to do for this class overall
good
He made it clear from day 1 that as long as we did the work, we'd come away with an A.
NA


5.   What did you find least valuable and helpful about the instructor?
NA
Excellent
N/A
Not enough instruction is given.
not really
It's hard to explain to him why we might be lacking something in a project.
Big teams. Half of your team will not do any work.
He never really helped out students when they were struggling.
N/A
good
None that I can think of
NA

6.   The instructor is fair and objective in evaluating students.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.48 25 0.51   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 13(52%) 12(48%)
7.   The instructor is well prepared and organized.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 25 0.71   0(0%) 0(0%) 3(12%) 9(36%) 13(52%)

8.   Which aspect of the course were most valuable?
The work itself
I liked the real-world type of experience provided by this course. I also liked being able to work in a development group.
This course is good for getting the experience of working with a team on a software development project early on without getting any real world experience yet, such as internships or a job. That alone makes this course an invaluable experience.
The group work in this class was the most valuable aspect of this class. This was the first time I've had to collectively manage a code-base and develop a product for a client.
Excellent
Project Milestone
Working on a project from a real customer helps emulate real world jobs.
milestone notice
Milestones helped upkeep of project.
Team time. Peer evaluations
The flexibility the course offered, allowing students to work on their own when they have time.
Hands-on experience is the most valuable part of this course.
-The resources/information provided in the class website -Team management and milestones
the milestones
good
The course website
NA
Working on a real site with a real client.


9.   Which aspect of the course were least valuable?
NA
There is no new content to "learn."
Excellent
N/A
Keeping people accountable made this course harder to learn from.
no
n/a
Team members
N/A
good
If your team isn't good at communication or just choose not to contribute, the class feels much more difficult than I think it's supposed to.
The class meetings
NA


10.   Other comments?
NA
Excellent
no
N/A
good
NA

11.   The instructor was open to comments and questions.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Rarely (1)  Sometimes (2)  Frequently (3)  Generally (4)  Almost Always (5) 
4.52 25 0.65   0(0%) 0(0%) 2(8%) 8(32%) 15(60%)
12.   The course was a valuable contribution to my education.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.36 25 0.91   1(4%) 0(0%) 1(4%) 10(40%) 13(52%)
13.   I learned a lot in this course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.28 25 0.84   0(0%) 1(4%) 3(12%) 9(36%) 12(48%)
14.   The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.6 25 0.58   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(4%) 8(32%) 16(64%)
15.   The instructor demonstrated knowledge of the course content.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.64 25 0.49   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 9(36%) 16(64%)
16.   This course challenged me intellectually.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.28 25 0.74   0(0%) 0(0%) 4(16%) 10(40%) 11(44%)
17.   The instructor both sets high standards and helps students achieve them.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.08 25 1.08   1(4%) 1(4%) 4(16%) 8(32%) 11(44%)
18.   The instructor was available for consultation.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.44 25 0.65   0(0%) 0(0%) 2(8%) 10(40%) 13(52%)
19.   Considering everything, how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
4.28 25 0.94   1(4%) 0(0%) 2(8%) 10(40%) 12(48%)
20.   What was the format of this class? online synchronous (class scheduled for particular days and times) online asynchronous (class conducted online - no scheduled class meeting)

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Online Synchronous ()  Online Asynchronous ()  In Person ()  Hybrid: In Person and Online Synchronous ()  Hybrid: In Person and Online Asynchronous ()  Hybrid: Online Synchronous and Asynchronous ()  Other () 
0.0 25 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 16(64%) 7(28%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(8%)

21.   If you answered 'Other' for the question above, please specify.
NA
It was listed as in person but that varied per class. Sometimes it was necessary to show up in person and other days it was on zoom or not required.
In person, online synchronous, and online asynchronous
Excellent
NA