Skip to main content

Survey Results



Course Survey Results


Kimberly   Compoc   HUM300, Fall 2022

Campus: University of Hawaii West Oahu Course: HUM 300 - Humanities Seminar
Department:   Humanities Crn (Section):   65362 (1W)    


1.   The instructor taught me methods of analysis for this field of study.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5)  N/A () 
4.0 4 0.82   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(25%) 2(50%) 1(25%) 0(0%)

2.   My overall evaluation of this course is...
An absolute must! The collaboration and engagement truly inspiring. The department is impressive and I am proud of my university for having so many accomplished scholars as faculty members . The course was wonderful and challenging!
It was a fun course, but sometimes the materials for the week's lectures would take up an unreasonable amount of time for the content of the actual lectures we would have.
It changed my life in a way, and it helped me think about what I want to do when I become a senior year.


3.   If this course was taken to fulfill course requirements for your concentration/major, how did this course enhance your personal and/or professional development in your concentration/major?
Perspective, i gain perspective, increased understanding and awareness. Activated my curiosity. reversed the intersection of all the disciplines in the Humanities and validated my decision to be a Humanities major.
It helped me to have a better picture of the overall humanities field.
This was made a requirement for students in the humanities discipline. It enhanced my confidence in reaching out to instructors for help and guidance.

4.   I would rate the overall effectiveness of the instructor: F=Inferior; D=Poor; C=Average; B=Good; A=Superior.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   F (1)  D (2)  C (3)  B (4)  A (5) 
4.5 4 0.58   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 2(50%)
5.   How much time did you spend during a typical week working on assignments, readings, chats, emails, etc. for this course?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   0 to 2.9 hours (1)  3 to 6.9 hours (2)  7 to 10.9 hours (3)  11 to 14.9 hours (4)  15+ hours (5) 
2.25 4 0.96   1(25%) 1(25%) 2(50%) 0(0%) 0(0%)

6.   Please comment on the activities or resources that could be added to this course to improve your learning.
It was executed perfectly.
I think just a better understanding for guest speakers on what is expected from them to make materials and lectures line up a little better.
Maybe some videos; the readings can be tiring to look at sometimes. Especially with two readings that can range from 20-40 pages.

7.   I expect my grade for the course to be a/an:

Mean N-Size Std Dev   F (1)  D (2)  C (3)  B (4)  A (5) 
4.5 4 0.58   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 2(50%)
8.   I learned a good deal of factual material in this course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.5 4 1.73   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 1(25%)
9.   I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.25 4 1.5   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(75%) 0(0%)
10.   The instructor makes good use of examples and illustrations.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.25 4 1.5   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(75%) 0(0%)
11.   The instructor stresses important points in lectures/discussions.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.25 4 1.71   1(25%) 0(0%) 1(25%) 1(25%) 1(25%)
12.   The instructor clearly stated at the beginning of the semester the objectives of the course and requirements.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.75 4 1.89   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(25%) 2(50%)
13.   The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.5 4 1.73   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 1(25%)
14.   The instructor was easy to talk with and available for consultation.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.5 4 1.73   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 1(25%)
15.   The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.0 4 1.41   1(25%) 0(0%) 1(25%) 2(50%) 0(0%)
16.   The amount of material covered in the course is reasonable.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.5 4 1.73   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 1(25%)

17.   Please list your suggestions for improving the course and/or the instructor's teaching style and methods.
The professor was informative, directive, through, present, availed and fair. The professor expected and brought out the best in us.
Instead of one big class, there can be two classes per week.


18.   My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
Excellent, appreciated and a gift to the intuition.
great!
Very kind and helpful. But with the schedule of the students and the instructor, we can't communicate effectively sometimes.

19.   Class assignments provided an effective aid for learning the subject matter.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.25 4 1.5   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(75%) 0(0%)
20.   The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
3.5 4 1.73   1(25%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(50%) 1(25%)