Skip to main content

Survey Results



Course Survey Results


Philip   Johnson   ICS314, Fall 2021

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Course: ICS 314 - Software Engineering I
Department:   Information& Computer Sciences Crn (Section):   83285 (001)    


1.   Global appraisal: Overall how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Very Good (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
2.   The teaching assistant was available for consultation.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 17 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 17(100%)
3.   Reading assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.76 17 0.44   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 4(24%) 13(76%)
4.   The instructor communicates effectively.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.76 17 0.44   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 4(24%) 13(76%)
5.   The instructor is enthusiastic about teaching.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 17 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 17(100%)
6.   The instructor was clear with course requirements and grading expectations.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.82 17 0.39   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(18%) 14(82%)
7.   Considering everything, how would you rate this INSTRUCTOR?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
8.   Did the instructor present material effectively?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.88 17 0.33   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(12%) 15(88%)
9.   I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
10.   The instructor was able to explain concepts clearly and effectively.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.88 16 0.34   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(13%) 14(88%)
11.   The instructor was well organized and prepared for each session.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.88 17 0.33   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(12%) 15(88%)
12.   The course objectives were clear.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
13.   The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
14.   The course was a valuable contribution to my education.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
15.   The instructor was available for consultation with students.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.82 17 0.53   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 1(6%) 15(88%)
16.   I learned a lot in this course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 17 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 17(100%)

17.   What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
very outgoing, nice
Dependable, Flexible, and Rigorous.
enthusiastic, motivating
Passionate, Approachable, Understanding
Enthusiastic, Understanding, Amazing
Always engaged, passionate about teaching
Friendly Nice Informative
Enthusiastic, knowledgeable, energized
cool and enthusiastic
enthusiastic, passionate
Upbeat, professional, and helpful
Passionate, Lenient, Knowledgeable.
Enthusiastic, effective
Consistent and easy-to-talk-to

18.   My general evaluation of the instructor's teaching effectiveness.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
4.82 17 0.39   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(18%) 14(82%)
19.   The instructor treated students with respect.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
20.   The instructor demonstrated knowledge of the course content.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 17 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 17(100%)
21.   This course challenged me intellectually.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.76 17 0.56   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 2(12%) 14(82%)
22.   The instructor both sets high standards and helps students achieve them.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.88 17 0.33   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(12%) 15(88%)
23.   The instructor was available for consultation.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.76 17 0.56   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 2(12%) 14(82%)
24.   Considering everything, how would you rate this COURSE?

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Very Poor (1)  Poor (2)  Average (3)  Good (4)  Excellent (5) 
4.94 17 0.24   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 16(94%)
25.   The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 17 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 17(100%)
26.   The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.47 17 0.8   0(0%) 0(0%) 3(18%) 3(18%) 11(65%)
27.   The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.82 17 0.39   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(18%) 14(82%)

28.   Additional Comments
I appreciated the amount of effort put in by Dr. Johnson and Branden. They both came to class ready to interact with students and seemed happy to be there. That kind of energy really helps make some of the more boring material fun.
It was a fun experience compared to other classes I had.
Great teacher, great class, but Calling a website an app doesn’t make web design software engineering.
This class was my favorite this semester. Nothing was super hard to learn, but it was still challenging and fun. And the professor and TA are very helpful.
N/A

29.   What was the format of this class? online synchronous (class scheduled for particular days and times) online asynchronous (class conducted online - no scheduled class meeting)

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Online Synchronous ()  Online Asynchronous ()  In Person ()  Hybrid: In Person and Online Synchronous ()  Hybrid: In Person and Online Asynchronous ()  Hybrid: Online Synchronous and Asynchronous ()  Other () 
0.0 17 0.0   16(94%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(6%) 0(0%)

30.   If you answered 'Other' for the question above, please specify.