17. What two or three single words best describe this instructor?
|
Easy going, knowledgable, professional
helpful, available, knowledgeable
|
18. My general evaluation of the instructor's teaching effectiveness.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor (1) |
Poor (2) |
Average (3) |
Good (4) |
Excellent (5) |
4.07 |
15 |
0.7 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
3(20%) |
8(53%) |
4(27%) |
|
19. The instructor treated students with respect.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.33 |
15 |
0.62 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
1(7%) |
8(53%) |
6(40%) |
|
20. The instructor demonstrated knowledge of the course content.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.27 |
15 |
0.46 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
11(73%) |
4(27%) |
|
21. This course challenged me intellectually.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.2 |
15 |
0.68 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
2(13%) |
8(53%) |
5(33%) |
|
22. The instructor both sets high standards and helps students achieve them.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.13 |
15 |
0.64 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
2(13%) |
9(60%) |
4(27%) |
|
23. The instructor was available for consultation.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.27 |
15 |
0.7 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
2(13%) |
7(47%) |
6(40%) |
|
24. Considering everything, how would you rate this COURSE?
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Very Poor (1) |
Poor (2) |
Average (3) |
Good (4) |
Excellent (5) |
3.93 |
15 |
0.88 |
|
0(0%) |
1(7%) |
3(20%) |
7(47%) |
4(27%) |
|
25. The instructor appears to have a thorough knowledge of the subject.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.13 |
15 |
0.64 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
2(13%) |
9(60%) |
4(27%) |
|
26. The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
4.07 |
15 |
0.7 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
3(20%) |
8(53%) |
4(27%) |
|
27. The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Strongly Disagree (1) |
Disagree (2) |
Neutral (3) |
Agree (4) |
Strongly Agree (5) |
3.93 |
15 |
0.88 |
|
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
6(40%) |
4(27%) |
5(33%) |
|
28. Additional Comments
|
There were no assignments since this was a project based class, so most of these questions are irrelevant....
The team project for this semester was interesting to work on. It gave me the perspective of working on code with others and customers in the health field.
I took ICS 314 more than a year ago, so I will say that I was rusty with the concepts learned in that class to this class during the beginning of the semester. But I was able to get used to it again as we worked on the project.
I really enjoyed this class and hope to continue my software engineering progress!
|
29. What was the format of this class?
online synchronous (class scheduled for particular days and times)
online asynchronous (class conducted online - no scheduled class meeting)
Mean |
N-Size |
Std Dev |
|
Online Synchronous () |
Online Asynchronous () |
In Person () |
Hybrid: In Person and Online Synchronous () |
Hybrid: In Person and Online Asynchronous () |
Hybrid: Online Synchronous and Asynchronous () |
Other () |
0.0 |
15 |
0.0 |
|
14(93%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
0(0%) |
1(7%) |
0(0%) |
|
30. If you answered 'Other' for the question above, please specify.
|
|