Skip to main content

Survey Results



Course Survey Results


Philip   Johnson   ICS414, Spring 2016

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Course: ICS 414 - Software Engineering II
Department:   Information& Computer Sciences Crn (Section):   88934 (001)    


1.   Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman (1)  Sophomore (2)  Junior (3)  Senior (4)  Grad (5)  Other (6) 
4.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%) 0(0%) 0(0%)
2.   Course - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Elective (1)  Required (2) 
1.5 2 0.71   1(50%) 1(50%)
3.   The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
4.   The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
5.   The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
6.   The instructor was consistently well-prepared and organized for class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
7.   The instructor was accessible to students.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
8.   I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
9.   I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)

10.   Which aspects of the course were most valuable?
- Being able to learn new technology as it comes out. - Being able to self teach new subjects while still having outside help.
Website and screencast for modules. Creating technical essays to help boost our portfolio.


11.   Which aspects of the course were least valuable?

12.   The instructor gives clear explanations.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
13.   The instructor seems to enjoy teaching.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
14.   The instructor seems knowledgeable in many areas.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
15.   The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
16.   The instructor was enthusiastic about the course material.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
17.   The instructor acknowledges all questions insofar as possible.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
18.   The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
19.   The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
20.   The instructor was professional.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
21.   The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
22.   The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
23.   In general, the course was well organized.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
24.   The instructor makes the course difficult enough to be stimulating.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)

25.   My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
excellent
Academically sound.

26.   Assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
27.   The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)
28.   Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 2 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(100%)

29.   My overall evaluation of this course is...
excellent
Experience filled.


30.   Other comments: