Skip to main content

Survey Results



Course Survey Results


Philip   Johnson   ICS414, Spring 2007

Campus: University of Hawaii at Manoa Course: ICS 414 - Software Engineering II
Department:   Information& Computer Sciences Crn (Section):   88269 (001)    


1.   Class Level (pick one) - please note that by answering this question you could potentially jeopardize your anonymity

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Freshman (1)  Sophomore (2)  Junior (3)  Senior (4)  Grad (5)  Other (6) 
4.2 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 4(80%) 1(20%) 0(0%)
2.   The instructor demonstrated knowledge of course content.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.6 5 0.55   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(40%) 3(60%)
3.   The instructor fulfilled the goals of the course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 5 0.55   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(60%) 2(40%)
4.   The instructor communicated effectively.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.6 5 0.55   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 2(40%) 3(60%)
5.   I gained a good understanding of concepts/principles in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
6.   I developed the ability to solve real problems in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
7.   I deepened my interest in the subject matter of this course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 5 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 5(100%)
8.   I developed skills needed by professionals in this field.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
5.0 5 0.0   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 5(100%)
9.   This course was helpful in developing new skills.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
10.   The instructor was effective in meeting the objectives of the course.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 5 0.55   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(60%) 2(40%)
11.   The instructor is willing to meet and help students outside class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
12.   The instructor makes me feel free to ask questions.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
13.   The design of this course lets me learn at my own pace.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 5 0.89   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 1(20%) 3(60%)
14.   The instructor seems well prepared for each class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 5 0.55   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 3(60%) 2(40%)
15.   The instructor presented the course materials in a clear and organized way.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.2 5 0.84   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 2(40%) 2(40%)
16.   In general, the course was well organized.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.2 5 0.84   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 2(40%) 2(40%)

17.   My overall evaluation of this instructor is....
great
One of if not the best instructor I've had at UH.
The instructor is good. He always teaches us new technology, keep us up to date. He doesn't follow the tradition way of teaching, using textbook and assign impractical homework. What he teaches is what is going in the real industry. He also listens to
Very knowledgeable about the field. Encourages us to learn on our own.

18.   Assignments are relevant to what is presented in class.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.8 5 0.45   0(0%) 0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 4(80%)
19.   The instructional materials (e.g., texts, handouts, etc.) were relevant to course objectives.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.4 5 0.89   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 1(20%) 3(60%)
20.   Grades are assigned fairly and impartially.

Mean N-Size Std Dev   Strongly Disagree (1)  Disagree (2)  Neutral (3)  Agree (4)  Strongly Agree (5) 
4.2 5 0.84   0(0%) 0(0%) 1(20%) 2(40%) 2(40%)

21.   My overall evaluation of this course is...
really good
Essential to anyone going into this field.
This is one of the best courses in ICS, in addition to ICS413. If you think you will writing software for your living, then this class is for you.
The class was pretty much an independent study course. Learning to create a software project on our own was a very valuable experience.
One of my top ICS classes I've ever taken.